#PLAIN TEXT WORKFLOW CODE#
#PLAIN TEXT WORKFLOW INSTALL#
I did not install Hugo control related packages (I prefer using CLI), but installed some Hugo and Markdown syntax plugins: I mainly use Visual Studio Code on macOS to edit Hugo content files. Hugo has some extensions contributed by the community to various editors. learn Markdown, shortcode code style, git and workflow. Companions who participate in collaboration together have a learning curve.
Few plugins/expansion kits (I think it’s an advantage, not sacrificing “fastness”).There is a command line tool (CLI) to facilitate workflow automation.Fast (time saving in various senses) (for example, it only takes 1077 ms to build 343 pages on Macbook Air (M1, 2020), and the average time spending per page is 3.14 ms).By using GitHub Pages or Amazon S3, I can just upload, set the DNS, and done. The output are static files, and there is no need to maintain a host of a specific specification.It will not become an orphan too soon (I don’t need to switch again too soon). After observing for a long time, Hugo has a large number of users and shows an increasing trend.The original content can be put into version control, while achieving remote backup.The Hugo content file format is plain text, with version control or file synchronization mechanism, I can choose any editor across multiple platforms.The Hugo content file format is plain text ( Front Matter + Markdown), there is a way out if I need to use another blog system in the future.From organizing notes, writing drafts, to Hugo content output, and even organizing slides, all in the common open format - Markdown - can be used throughout, saving me a lot of data conversion time.Several advantages of adopting Hugo at that time and continuing to use Hugo as my blog system: Regardless of entry or application, I hope you can get some clips that can improve your work efficiency :) Advantages and Disadvantages I started to use Hugo since 2017, gradually build the corresponding workflow and tools, and have some notes here.
2010.When I was in high school, I was the director of the school magazine club, that makes me be a little bit familiar with publishing. csl file to add the branckets etc., to create mystyle.csl (1) Write the markdown, using the citations in the RTFscan format, (2) Run the scan using the mystyle format, with the procedure above - be my best bet? Is there any other way? rtf (3) use RTF scan (4) copy the text from the resulting RTF and paste as plain text. But this would be overcome by a little effort, (1) open RTF editor (2) paste the plain text and save as. Using the RTF scan for plain texts has been discussed before and disregarded as lower priority circa 2012(1–4). I'm also guessing that tweaking *.csl files to add the footnote syntax ( part) will not require too much effort. Details in the format, I'm thinking, could be handled separately.Īs I look up, the RTF scan feature offers similar functionality as for bibliography management. The most important part is that I don't have to pick up every citation manually to generate the bibliography when I'm finished. > This good article (Human et al., 2021) exists. The ` >` is just for display here and not wanted. The final output I'd like the most is like the following, using the markdown footnote syntax. Now I'm writing in a markdown (essentially plain text), how can I have zotero manage the citations and generate the bibliography automatically? The word processor plugin works great, especially because it takes care of the bibliography as I cite an item. Hello, I'm a first timer, both for zotero and for citation managers in general (I've been doing it by hand).
0 kommentar(er)
